In an ideal world
Mar 06, 2006 in Life-logger
1) There would be no borders to separate the nations.
2) People would be of the same skin colour, hence no differences.
3) There would be only one religion.
4) Actually, there wouldn't be any need for religion. So, no religion.
3) There would only be women.
4) I meant, there would only be men. In the ideal world, periods wouldn't have to exist.
5) PMS would be an unknown concept.
6) Because there won't be women, there won't be sex.
7) But no worries, you wouldn't need sex to achieve an orgasm. Laughter will suffice.
Sadness, pain, agony… all these negative emotions would be non-existent.
9) There would be no tears, no anger, no hurt.
10) Every one would be laughing.
11) Because of (10), you'd think the whole world were a coalition of nutcracks.
12) Because people lived happily always, governments would not have to exist.
13) Because governments do not exist, taxes would be eliminated.
14) There wouldn't be any need for taxes anyway, as there would be abundance. Everything would be free.
15) Even the petrol for your car would be free.
16) Wait. We wouldn't need cars in an ideal world. Human beings would have the ability to apparate.
17) That just means we could appear anywhere, anytime we want to. Even in Amber Chia's shower as she is showering.
18) But Amber Chia wouldn't exist, as there wouldn't be women.
19) Even if she did exist, she wouldn't need to shower, because ugly things like dirtyness wouldn't exist. She'd be damn clean.
20) If Amber Chia were a morally upright and extremely clean virgin, you'd find her quite boring-hoh?
21) Never mind Amber Chia, I think, in an ideal world, we wouldn't need lots of things to laugh or entertain ourselves with, we can self-initiate laughter anyway. TV, radio, the Internet… all these things would be pointless.
22) Information would not be THAT valuable. Because there are no borders, no skin-colour differences, no religion, no women, you wouldn't need to find out THAT many things… you would know so many things anyway. Ignorance is bliss would actually make sense in the ideal world.
23) Of course, without the Internet, people wouldn't have to have blogs. Anyway, without any regard for negative emotions, or differences in opinion, why would you need to have a blog?
24) Without blogs, there wouldn't be any bloggers. Without bloggers, you wouldn't need to have information overload. And without information overload, you wouldn't have to suffer so many arguments, and without arguments, you'd have peace.
25) But even without the concept of (1) to (24), I know this of an ideal world lah: Bloggers who participated in this stupid debate would have been doing something more worthwhile than trying to prove each the bigger idiot.
Alas, who says we were living in Utopia anyway?