In an ideal world

Monday, March 6th, 2006 @ 9:01 am | Life-logger

1) There would be no borders to separate the nations.
2) People would be of the same skin colour, hence no differences.
3) There would be only one religion.
4) Actually, there wouldn't be any need for religion. So, no religion.
3) There would only be women.
4) I meant, there would only be men. In the ideal world, periods wouldn't have to exist.
5) PMS would be an unknown concept.
6) Because there won't be women, there won't be sex.
7) But no worries, you wouldn't need sex to achieve an orgasm. Laughter will suffice.
8) Sadness, pain, agony… all these negative emotions would be non-existent.
9) There would be no tears, no anger, no hurt.
10) Every one would be laughing.
11) Because of (10), you'd think the whole world were a coalition of nutcracks.
12) Because people lived happily always, governments would not have to exist.
13) Because governments do not exist, taxes would be eliminated.
14) There wouldn't be any need for taxes anyway, as there would be abundance. Everything would be free.
15) Even the petrol for your car would be free.
16) Wait. We wouldn't need cars in an ideal world. Human beings would have the ability to apparate.
17) That just means we could appear anywhere, anytime we want to. Even in Amber Chia's shower as she is showering.
18) But Amber Chia wouldn't exist, as there wouldn't be women.
19) Even if she did exist, she wouldn't need to shower, because ugly things like dirtyness wouldn't exist. She'd be damn clean.
20) If Amber Chia were a morally upright and extremely clean virgin, you'd find her quite boring-hoh?
21) Never mind Amber Chia, I think, in an ideal world, we wouldn't need lots of things to laugh or entertain ourselves with, we can self-initiate laughter anyway. TV, radio, the Internet… all these things would be pointless.
22) Information would not be THAT valuable. Because there are no borders, no skin-colour differences, no religion, no women, you wouldn't need to find out THAT many things… you would know so many things anyway. Ignorance is bliss would actually make sense in the ideal world.
23) Of course, without the Internet, people wouldn't have to have blogs. Anyway, without any regard for negative emotions, or differences in opinion, why would you need to have a blog?
24) Without blogs, there wouldn't be any bloggers. Without bloggers, you wouldn't need to have information overload. And without information overload, you wouldn't have to suffer so many arguments, and without arguments, you'd have peace.

25) But even without the concept of (1) to (24), I know this of an ideal world lah: Bloggers who participated in this stupid debate would have been doing something more worthwhile than trying to prove each the bigger idiot.

Alas, who says we were living in Utopia anyway?

20 Responses to “In an ideal world”

  1. li Says:

    ideal world will be way too boring.

  2. Kurt Says:

    In an ideal world, I could transform into Baja Hitam.

  3. ShaolinTiger Says:

    Yah the world is far from perfect, if the world was a little more perfect every country in the world would have signed the land mine treaty, and stinkapore wouldn’t still be manufacturing and stockpiling land mines.

  4. Jeremy C Says:

    Hmmm…could we swap Amber Chia for someone else…?

    Then again, anything’s possible in Utopia, right?

  5. Celebrity Vivids Says:

    that’d be an ideal world for a boring fooker, coming from you not surprising

  6. spiller Says:

    man can still have orgasm without women :P

  7. 9393 Says:

    women too capable of self service orgasm, maybe annimals incapable

  8. dreamer idiot Says:

    In an ideal world, there is only heaven…and as fairy tales tell us, we all live happily ever after. :)

  9. S-Kay Says:

    Girl, you shouldn’t have used Amber’s name in the context lah. Maybe someone else? =P Coz I dun think many would wanna appear in Amber’s shower and you just stepped on Amber’s biggest worshipper’s tail =P

  10. vincent Says:

    Eh I wanna appear in the same shower with Amber Chia.

  11. viewtru Says:

    In an ideal world, humans will not exist. Only protozoa. Same sex protozoa. They’ll be virgins because they multiply by cellular division. Except that they will not feel the need to multiply because they are already contented. So contented that they don’t even wank. They don’t have fun coz they don’t need fun. Dumbass protozoa.

  12. chengsim Says:

    26. future mothers won’t be experiencing the pain of childbirth (argh. Eve shouldn’t have ate the damn bladdy apple!)

    27. acne will not be treated as something awful or a flaw but a beauty spot, sun kisses…acne makes you look more gorgeous! *sobs* i wish.

  13. minishorts Says:

    viewtru: i don’t quite like utopia hahahaha.

  14. tigerjoe Says:

    In an ideal world, I could teleport myself into the shower cubicle at the May & Choy twins’ place. While the two of them were lathering up each other.

  15. lainie Says:

    hahaha….that’s amusing.

  16. jacy Says:

    Ideal world = no humans. Now that’s ideal.

  17. S-Kay Says:

    OMG…MAY AND CHOY???????? Tiger? Are you freaking serious. They’re so freaking annoying and so not hot! Haha =P

  18. minishorts Says:

    i think i’d be terrified if i were to be locked up in a shower together with two naked Brad Pitts. haha

  19. Dabido (Teflon) Says:

    ‘1) There would be no borders to separate the nations.’

    Europe????

    2) People would be of the same skin colour, hence no differences.

    Oh dear, sounds too KKK like for me. Anyway, in an ideal place, no one really gives a hoot what your skin colour is … it could be green for all we care … except that might mean you’ve died and gone off a little … but no one would judge you for it.

    ‘3) There would be only one religion.’

    Or religious tolerance. Too many people use the ‘One Religion’ thing to kill people of other religions.

    ‘4) Actually, there wouldn’t be any need for religion. So, no religion.’

    Sounds better, but also depends on your definition of religion.

    ‘3) There would only be women.’

    Sounds good to me, I don’t mind becoming a lesbian. [Lainie look out!] ;-)

    ‘4) I meant, there would only be men. In the ideal world, periods wouldn’t have to exist.’

    No periods sounds very ‘Brave New World’ like. Very Aldus Huxley

    ‘5) PMS would be an unknown concept.’

    Many men still don’t beelive it exists, so to them, it is an unknown concept.

    ‘6) Because there won’t be women, there won’t be sex.’

    Um … now it’s turning nightmarish!

    ‘7) But no worries, you wouldn’t need sex to achieve an orgasm. Laughter will suffice.’

    Spoken like someone who is a virgin.

    ‘8) Sadness, pain, agony… all these negative emotions would be non-existent.’

    So … no pain … no way to know that sticking your face in a plane propeller is bad??? That’s not good. Pain has it’s purpose, it’s a protection device.

    ‘9) There would be no tears, no anger, no hurt.’

    Joy Luck Club just lost all it’s appeal.

    ‘10) Every one would be laughing.’

    Like when they visit my blog? Oh wait … I that’s confused, not laughing … still I was sort of close. :-)

    ‘11) Because of (10), you’d think the whole world were a coalition of nutcracks.’

    So no difference to present world … except there isn’t enough laughter.

    ‘12) Because people lived happily always, governments would not have to exist.’

    Yeah! Let’s get rid of Lawyers too.

    ‘13) Because governments do not exist, taxes would be eliminated.’

    How would we fund the hospitals, schools, roads etc?

    ‘14) There wouldn’t be any need for taxes anyway, as there would be abundance. Everything would be free.’

    Sounds good in concept … where is the incentive to do anything though?

    ‘15) Even the petrol for your car would be free.’

    Wouldn’t we do without the cars …

    ‘16) Wait. We wouldn’t need cars in an ideal world. Human beings would have the ability to apparate.’

    apparate? Sounds rather mystical … are we all goign to be witches/warlocks then? Wouldn’t that mean we go to hell?

    ‘17) That just means we could appear anywhere, anytime we want to. Even in Amber Chia’s shower as she is showering.’

    I don’t know Amber Chia … wouldn’t that upset her having all of us in her shower? Does it fit fifty people?

    ‘18) But Amber Chia wouldn’t exist, as there wouldn’t be women.’

    Stop upsetting me!

    ‘19) Even if she did exist, she wouldn’t need to shower, because ugly things like dirtyness wouldn’t exist. She’d be damn clean.’

    Are we living in space?

    ‘20) If Amber Chia were a morally upright and extremely clean virgin, you’d find her quite boring-hoh?’

    No, you forget the challenge of the chase!

    ‘21) Never mind Amber Chia, I think, in an ideal world, we wouldn’t need lots of things to laugh or entertain ourselves with, we can self-initiate laughter anyway. TV, radio, the Internet… all these things would be pointless.’

    Well, they are pointless, doesn’t stop me using them. :-)

    ‘22) Information would not be THAT valuable. Because there are no borders, no skin-colour differences, no religion, no women, you wouldn’t need to find out THAT many things… you would know so many things anyway. Ignorance is bliss would actually make sense in the ideal world.’

    So, we’re all Umpa Lumpa’s and live in Charlies Chocolate Factory?

    ‘23) Of course, without the Internet, people wouldn’t have to have blogs. Anyway, without any regard for negative emotions, or differences in opinion, why would you need to have a blog?’

    To complain about the lack of women and sex!

    ‘24) Without blogs, there wouldn’t be any bloggers. Without bloggers, you wouldn’t need to have information overload. And without information overload, you wouldn’t have to suffer so many arguments, and without arguments, you’d have peace.’

    I disagree! :-) But only to deliberately be contrary and to make a point. :-)

    ‘25) But even without the concept of (1) to (24), I know this of an ideal world lah: Bloggers who participated in this stupid debate would have been doing something more worthwhile than trying to prove each the bigger idiot.’

    Yeah, they should just wait for the yearly blog awards to see who won ‘Idiot of the year’

    ‘Alas, who says we were living in Utopia anyway? ‘

    A few people, but I still blame Sir Thomas More for writing the book to begin with!

  20. minishorts Says:

    oh dabido! lol!

Leave a Reply

Bad Behavior has blocked 1239 access attempts in the last 7 days.