On being missional
Mar 27, 2008 in God-worshipper
I find it amusing that there are some people who think that I'm against missional ministries in my previous posts. The emotional outbursts that I allowed on print reflected my personal views of the overseas short-term missions trips that so many of our local Christ-fervent youth like to mention in passing. I love the concept of outreach for Christ - but my peeve was mainly towards the definition and naming of vacational fellowship weekends the local church institutions are so quick to term as 'missions trip'.
I'm struggling with this - and it is because I am a righteous bitch. My personal view (PERSONAL) is that a trip to an overseas country that only lasts for a week (which includes the sight seeing) cannot be called missional. My peeve is also towards institutions that target the so-called 'problematic' regions or country-zones, why Thailand or Myanmar or Vietnam or Cambodia, when we have our own peoples in our own country who needs outreach? I'm saying what about the people in the rural settlements, what about the people who are the urban poor? I'm saying what about some kind of commitment before terming it a missions trip?
To me a missions trip is short term if its at least one month long, and a real missions journey has to go beyond 1 year - that I must admit this is my very skewed view of what Christian mission has to look like, because I can't swallow the touch and go concept of lets go and meet, and lets come home, all within 3- 10 days, and because of this also, its very hard for me to accept it when groups of sangat Christian people come to me and rave about the last week-long real missional trip that they participated in.
—
It is my personal view that because of the way that most Malaysian Christians communicate themselves to our non-Christian friends, we have churned the religion of Christ into a somewhat purely conversional kind of belief. It doesn't help that the louder voices in the M'sian Christian circle tend to behave as if followers of Christ are all about bringing people into the tent of His kingdom. It doesn't help that the occasional visit to church allows our non-Christian believers to perceive us as exclusivists, we can't blame them because we behave like that, we talk strange like that. 'Are you Christian?' 'Why not?' 'Do you want to accept Christ?' 'Don't you want to go to heaven?'
It doesn't help it also when so many Christians themselves have come to believe that the belief in Jesus is for the entry into heaven - and so many Christians convert for this belief, die for this belief. But even this is all right to me - I can still learn to accept all of this miscommunication, albeit having to struggle with it a little.
And yet I'm angry even, with the concept of 'being missional' being so severely misconstrued . Which leads me to the realization that this situation is something that Christians have created for themselves, resulting in this severe misconception and misdefinition of the Christian faith that is exclusive, that divides, that breaks families apart. I mean, you have whole websites dedicated to accusing Jesus Christ of breaking families apart, citing verses out of context like that Who is my mother? and who are my brethren? line…
The worst thing is, you have CHRISTIANS themselves saying that its right to not sayang your mother if your mother doesn't sayang Jesus, because Jesus said such-and-such.
My pastor called me yesterday, to remind that we are all about being missional, and this is exactly what I'm talking about right now. Yes, I agree that Christians must define themselves a missional community. The problem is, the concept of what is being missional must be communicated in a proper way first. And it isn't right that we try to educate the non-Christians on what our mission is all about yet when Christians ourselves can't even grasp this entire concept of what Jesus has called us to do. The problem, I feel, is that we have given the word mission a very 'modern' concept, and that we have set out to complete some kind of task - and to many many Christian communities the word missions MUST be correlated to the converting of people.
And so as a way to complete and achieve a mission, something must be done, we have to draft a strategy or a method so to speak. And this is where I believe the confusion falls in - not at the topper levels of planning, but rather by the time the proposed action is cascaded to the communities, we completely miss the point. I mean so many Christians actually believe that you must go on a trip for several days in order to experience what is being a missionary. But that isn't the point at all.
Being missional isn't a kind of 'mode' that Christians (or non-Christians) can switch on and off. Its not about dedicating weekend hours to cleaning orphanages either. Being missional permeates the entire Christian life, and it is a call that we have to respond to by being 'aware' all the time. Being missional, as Al Hsu so rightly puts it, is about being intentional about looking outward, influencing others and society. Its about impacting society, transforming society.
'Into what?' some people may ask. Non-Christians in our communities accuse us of defining a goal, transforming the rest of the world into followers of Christ.
And that's where the confusion falls in, because people can't seem to understand what defines a follower of Christ. And this is where I become a universalist, so please don't kill me here. The definition of 'Christian' will then take on a very different meaning for different people. Some people say you're Christian when you go to Church, when you profess for only God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit, when you've been baptised, when you reject all other idols and when you speak in tongues…
Some people (like me), choose to believe that being Christian is when you understand the reasons for doing all of the above (the go to church, become baptize, the rejection of idols, the coming of Christ, why God sent his son) and consciously make the choice to have the figure of Christ as the aim for perfection. And because you are intent on following the directions for living set down by Jesus, you make a choice to consistently act by His spirit at every single minute, consequently you become missional through your actions. You don't set a goal, you're not there to achieve something… Being Christian to me, is about constantly creating a God-approved context for living, and here is where the impacting 'society' comes in.
So to me, when being missional is due to a material goal (of having XX number of people in the church by XXXX date), it completely defeats the whole aspire towards Christ attitude that we are all called to have. It is when we attach the concept of an all too human target to the teachings of Christ that we become a confused lot, and in order to redeem ourselves we start to propose labels and draw distinctions between the non-core 'beliefs' in life. It is when we start saying strange things like, 'Do you know that you are going to hell because you don't believe in Jesus Christ?' because we're on an urgent 'target-driven' motivation to achieve the goal we have previously set… and its when we completely miss the entire point of Christ's entire life on earth.
…
OK lah I cut down my rant lah. My point is, being missional isn't about going on a short term mission trips several times a year. Being missional is about a lifestyle you take on until the day you breathe your last breath. And then, since I'm on this topic, maybe, well, we should rename the word 'mission trips' so that at least we can learn to stop being confused about it.
…
You know there is a reason why I'm not in ministry, or I'm not meant to be in pastoral service. Bacalah atas. I think I just confused myself.


















